Automotive diagnostic allows you to keep a new car

Hong Kong's top officials have renewed their criticisms against the United States for imposing new sanctions on the city over Beijing's national security law, slamming Washington for its "unacceptable double standards", and vowing not to let US hegemony get in the way.
Hong Kong executive councillor Ronny Tong Ka-wah, an adviser in the city leader's cabinet, on Sunday hit out at the US and other foreign countries for suspending extradition treaties with Hong Kong, insisting that the city's judiciary remained independent under the national security law.
His comments followed Beijing's pledge on Wednesday to retaliate tit-for-tat, after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order ending Hong Kong's preferential trading status. The US also set up a law to penalise mainland Chinese and local officials deemed to have been involved in eroding the city's freedoms, as well as to suspend extradition arrangements with Hong Kong. You may also like: Launch scan tool.
Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China.
Speaking on a radio programme, Tong suggested that the suspension of extradition treaties showed that some foreign politicians saw the new law as a death knell for the city's judicial independence. Under the legislation, Hong Kong's leader can designate a group of judges to oversee national security cases.
"Under our agreements, people would only be extradited over criminal offences, not political crimes . To suspend such arrangements would be allowing politics to override justice," Tong said.
Britain's top judge Robert Reed, president of the British Supreme Court and a non-permanent judge in Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal, recently voiced concerns over Beijing' national security law for Hong Kong.
Reed warned that whether his British colleagues could "continue to serve as judges in Hong Kong will depend on (this) remaining compatible with judicial independence and the rule of law".
Asked to comment on Reed's statement, Tong said: "It would be worrying if 'one country, two systems' cannot be safeguarded in law enforcement. But the law has only been implemented for two weeks, we should wait and see."
Writing on his official blog on Sunday, Chief Secretary Matthew Cheung Kin-chung said: "The US used national security (as a pretext) to justify its own measures such as the law (to penalise officials) and the executive order.
"But they also regarded the central government's national security legislation as undermining Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy. This is obviously a double standard, and is absolutely unacceptable."
Cheung said: "The Hong Kong government will fully cooperate with the central government's retaliatory measures, and will not let American hegemony succeed."
Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po also wrote on his official blog on Sunday that US sanctions would have "limited impact" on the city's economy.
Chan noted that since the national security law was implemented in Hong Kong last month, the city's financial market had remained stable and orderly, and the Hong Kong dollar had also remained strong.
"There is no obvious sign of capital outflow from among our banking system. On the contrary, more than US$11 billion in capital has entered the system since June. The amount of deposits in our banks has also increased," he added.
Chan said as an international financial hub, the success of Hong Kong was based on factors such as the rule of law, the free flow of information and capital, as well as the freedom of expression and publication.
"The national security law would safeguard these important values, and ensure Hong Kong's long-term stability," he said.
Chan added that while the market needed time to adapt to the new legislation, the implementation of the law had already played a role in restoring social order.
Rebel City: Hong Kong's Year of Water and Fire is a new book of essays that chronicles the political confrontation that has gripped the city since June 2019. Edited by the South China Morning Post's Zuraidah Ibrahim and Jeffie Lam, the book draws on work from the Post's newsrooms across Hong Kong, Beijing, Washingt.

Detroit Tigers third baseman Jeimer Candelario already has made a number of magnificent plays at the hot corner. His instincts - including on a sharp grounder off Whit Merrifield's bat in the eighth inning - helped the team to a 4-3 win Tuesday.
He made a couple more in Wednesday's 5-4 victory as the Tigers improved to 4-2 this season.
"I hit him groundballs today," manager Ron Gardenhire said Tuesday. "I feel pretty good about myself."
The prospect acquired in a 2017 trade with the Chicago Cubs isn't so young anymore. He's a 26-year-old in his third full season with the Tigers. With thes confidence in the field (15 assists, no errors), but he's still laboring at the plate.
This season he's 0-for-13 with two walks and six strikeouts in four games, including a 0-for-4 performance with two strikeouts Wednesday.
[ Once projected to Tigers at No. 1, Royals' Brady Singer now faces them ]
"Sometimes we don't hit the way we want," Candelario said Thursday. "But if I could play a really good third base until thes, I will help my team no matter what, offensively or defensively."
Gardenhire moved him from No. 5 to No. 7 in the batting order Thursday against Royals prospect Brady Singer, sliding Christin Stewart and Cameron Maybin ahead of him.
Three players - Dawel Lugo, Harold Castro and Jordy Mercer - are pushing Candelario for playing time. Last season, the 26-year-old Castro hit .291 with five homers and 38 RBIs in 97 games.
Meanwhile, 21-year-old prospect Isaac Paredes is waiting at Fifth Third Field in Toledo with the reserve squad.
"I want to help my team win," Candelario said. "That's the mentality, no matter if I'm 3-for-3, or if I'm 0-for-2, 0-for-3. That's really helped me a lot, and being ready for anything."
[ Tigers need Candelario, Stewart to 'step up' or else they'll be replaced ]
He went through similar offensive struggles for Toros del Este in the Dominican Winter League this offseason. He hit .244 with one home run and 14 RBIs in 23 regular-season games, starting slow but eventually making improvements. Candelario was named MVP of the league's championship series.
When Candelario came to Detroit in 2017, he hit .330 with two home runs and 13 RBIs in 27 games; he has regressed each year since.
In 20, he was second on the team with 19 homers, but was otherwise dismal, with a .224 batting average, 54 RBIs, 160 strikeouts and 66 walks. Last season, he slashed a measly .203/.306/.337, with only eight homers and 32 RBIs in 94 games.
[ Candelario's secret edge in position battle: Tips from an All-Star ]
And this year, he's hitless through four games.
"Candy's on a mission, on a mission to get it done," Gardenhire said. "He's worked hard, and it shows right on the field."
It's unusual to see Miguel Cabrera struggle in late July. Typically, that's when he is at his best. This season, however, is unlike any other.
Through six games, the 37-year-old is 2-for-22 (.091) with one home run and two RBIs. He has six strikeouts and four walks.
"He's trying to find his swing, gets frustrated," Gardenhire said. "He hits the ball right in the nose, and it's going at people right now. It's just one of those things. He wants to be a part of this thing and hit, and he will.
"As a manager, you got tons of things to worry about. I'm not worried about Miggy. This guy can hit. He hit a couple of bullets, they went right at people. He'll find his swing, get some holes. Once he does that, he'll be on a run."
[ Cabrera shows up slimmer, which could mean big things this season ]
Cabrera played 136 games through a right knee injury last season, but Gardenhire often gave him a day off when the team had a day game following a night game.
For now, don't expect the 11-time All-Star to ask for rest.
"It's early," Gardenhire said. "He likes to play."
Right-hander Casey Mize, the organization's top prospect, is succeeding at Fifth Third Field in Toledo with the reserve squad. Pitching coach Rick Anderson said the 23-year-old could've benefited from a minor league season.

China could be set to introduce legislation against food wastage, following President Xi Jinping's call this week for the country to change its habits.
Xi has issued a directive demanding more regulations and public education to promote frugality. He called China's food waste problem "shocking and distressing," and said the country needs to stay vigilant about potential food security crises.
Zhang Guilong, an official with the Legislative Affairs Commission, under the National People's Congress Standing Committee, China's top legislative body, said the commission would formulate regulations on preventing food waste.
Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China.
"We would strengthen management of all aspects including grain production, purchase, storage, transport, processing and consumption," Zhang was quoted as saying on the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, China's anti-corruption watchdog.
"Specifically, (we would) advocate a reasonable and healthy dining culture and establish a long-term mechanism to stop food waste," he said.
The onus placed on food security comes with uncertainties over food production and trade worldwide caused by the coronavirus pandemic and worsening China-US relations.
"We should always have a sense of crisis over food security, especially amid the fallout of the Covid-19 epidemic, despite China having consecutive bumper harvests in recent years," Xi was quoted as saying by state news agency Xinhua on Tuesday.
Although there is no sign showing China facing an imminent food crisis, Xi's remarks on food security have prompted nationwide discussions on how to save food.
Agricultural experts have said food wastage is severe in China and legislation was needed to change people's dining habits.
Zheng Fengtian, a professor of agricultural economics at Renmin University, said China's food wastage was startling and unlikely to be changed by other means.
"It would be very hard to curb food wastage through people's consciousness or NGO campaigns," he said. "Awareness and behavior can be changed by law, just like waste sorting in many cities."
An investigation in 20 by the Institute of Geographic and National Resources Research and the World Wide Fund for Nature estimated that Chinese consumers in four large cities had wasted 17 to million metric tons of food served in 2015 - enough to feed 30 to 50 million people for a year.
The investigation, which surveyed 195 restaurants in Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu and Lhasa, found waste of 93 grams per person per meal, or 12% of the food, according to China News Agency.
Government data suggest that China does not currently have a national food shortage problem. Xinhua reported on July 16 that this summer's grain output had reached a record high of 143 million metric tons, up 1% from last year.
The National Food Strategic Reserves Administration found in May that the national grain inventory was nearing a record level and that food reserves were sufficient to feed the 1.4 billion population for over a year.
It said on Wednesday that so far this year the state had bought 9 million metric tons of wheat less than by the same stage last year, without giving reasons.
"The authorities are making preparations for the long run in case the international situation deteriorates," Gu Su, a political scientist at Nanjing University, said.
The cities of Wuhan, Fuzhou and Xianning have already launched campaigns recommending that large groups in restaurants order one dish fewer than the number of diners.
Video-sharing apps Douyin and Kuaishou said on Wednesday that they would delete posts or close down accounts if people ate excessive amounts in their videos, according to news website Thepaper.cn.
More Articles from Inkstone
Four in 10 American firms ‘could leave Hong Kong over national security law'
Beijing tells troops ‘not to fire the first shot' in South China Sea
What is China's digital currency?
A wine renaissance in Taiwan
Why can the US force TikTok to sell?
For more on China-focused articles visit inkst.

Today, Ford teased its plans to electrify the F-150, committing $700 million and 300 new jobs to its Dearborn factory for the new model. However, until it arrives in 2022, hybrids will serve as the bridge for the automaker. Those will come with the 2021 model, which entered production today. The first models will begin arriving at dealers by November, and a new video from the F150gen14 YouTube channel shows that those other pickups from those other brands should be worried.
The video shows the 201 Ford F-150 Powerboost Hybrid with the 3.5-liter V6 drag racing the Ram 1500 Hemi E-Torque, Autel MaxiIM IM608
. with both a towing trailer and a load. To say the race was a blowout would be an understatement. The F-150 leaps off the line and continues to pull away from the Ram, putting a couple of truck lengths between the two vehicles before the short video ends.
Ford's hybrid powertrain, branded Powerboost, pairs a twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V6 with a 35-kilowatt motor and a 1.5-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery. The automaker hasn't revealed its horsepower or torque figures, though Ford has said it aims for the model to be the most powerful pickup in its class. The Ram sports the company's 5.7-liter Hemi V8 that produces 395 horsepower (295 kilowatts) and 410 pound-feet (555 Newton-meters) of torque, giving it a 12,750-pound max tow rating. Ford is promising up to 12,000 pounds of max towing for the Powerboost-equipped F-150.
The new hybrid powertrain for the F-150 came with a thorough, though subtle redesign. One would be hard-pressed to pick up the exterior changes of the 2021 F-150 compared to the 2020 model at a distance, but Ford did a lot under the skin. The automaker added a host of small, thoughtful upgrades, like the available onboard generator, a sleeper seat, a redesigned infotainment suite, and even a desk.

I think after Jack Ross' tenure this myth should be dispelled rapidly. For all Sunderland were poor for swathes of Saturday's game, football only cares about results. Of course, we all want to see aesthetically pleasing football, stuff that excites us and catches the eye, but alas, in League One it may be a desire unfulfilled.
Right now, You may need: Autel OBD2 Diagnostic Tool. especially at such an early stage in the season, the priority is undoubtedly to get points on the board, especially given such uncertainty surrounding the continuation of the campaign due to the ongoing pandemic.
Accumulating points is clearly crucial regardless of performance, and with such a long season ahead following a long break, few teams - if any - have begun the new campaign playing to their potential in League One, which reiterates the need to be on the front foot where points on the board are concerned.
However, if points start to come hard to obtain, performances will be brought under increasing scrutiny which highlights the fine balance of performance v result. Many times last season and the preceding season, we saw glimpses of a brand of football that got us the edge of our seat, which only provided a sense of what could have been.
For now, anyway, we should purely focus on building momentum and mentality in preparation for what is set to be a long and uncertain season and worry about style later. After all, as Wycombe have shown, you don't concern yourself with how you get promoted when you're celebrating the fact.
It's always nice when you don't play well and pick up the three points, but we were so lucky on Saturday to get anything at all.
Until Grant Leadbitter put the ball on the spot we didn't look like we had a chance of scoring. Relying on that kind of luck to paper over poor performances will get us nowhere. By all means, celebrate a cheeky result, but performance is the key to consistency which has been our systemic problem for years now.
We need solid performances far more than we need freakish results like this because over the course of a season a consistent level of performance increases the likelihood of results.
Put it this way - if I find a fiver on the floor, I pick it up. I don't quit my job hoping that the streets will be littered with cash every time I leave the house!
The early weeks of the season are always games where supporters put more emphasis on performances than is normal. At the moment, Sunderland fans are looking to see whether we will be able to produce the results we have seen in the last two games on a consistent basis to ensure promotion.
If Sunderland had ground out two wins (and two clean sheets) against promotion rivals in December, few fans would care about the performance as long as we were winning those games to keep us in a position at the top of the division.
Overall, I couldn't care less if Sunderland don't muster an "expected Goal" for the rest of the season if we keep winning games and climbing up the division. However, it's unlikely that we can go on a good run of results without putting in good performances.
Games against Oxford and Peterborough aren't good ones to play well and get beat, but games against the weaker teams will require Sunderland to show more in the attacking third of the pitch than we've seen so far this season.
The match on Saturday reminded me of the play-off match against Portsmouth. In fairness, the play-off match had more excitement, over the two legs we beat Portsmouth with just the one goal scored from arguably our only genuine bit of quality in 0 minutes of football. Ultimately, we didn't have enough to win promotion.
As Gary Bennett said midway through the second half against Peterborough:
We'll not win promotion playing like this.
Since that play-off semi-final against Portsmouth we are still no further forward, personnel-wise certainly, in terms of goal-threat. Three things that needed addressing were a lack pace and power, especially in forward positions as well as a genuine dangerous goalscorer. We may have three forwards that most of the league would like at their disposal, but we have to turn that into goals not just analyse their past goal tallies .

Lennon was growing increasingly frustrated on the sideline and opted for a double change before the hour mark.
Ryan Christie and Patryk Klimala entered the fray in place of Turnbull and Edouard.
The Pole went close shortly after, with his front post flick dropping just wide of the target.
Celtic continued to struggle, and Leigh Griffiths was given a first appearance of the season off the bench while captain Scott Brown was introduced from the bench late on.
They attempted to make the breakthrough with aerial bombardment, swinging cross after cross into the box.
St Johnstone held out well but eventually one of those crosses paid dividends.
Kris Ajer worked it down the right for Elhamed, See: diagnostic code reader. who got his head up and spotted the substitute making a late run.
The Saints defence were less attentive to Griffiths' movement and he was afforded a free header which he planted beyond Clark.
That had already wrapped up the points but Klimala added a more resounding look to the scoreline.
The Pole was taken out as he looked to break into the box but he sprang to his feet, wriggled through and fired it high beyond Clark.
Formation frustration
Last season's switch to 3-5-2 helped Celtic blow teams away and establish a commanding lead before the pandemic brought the season to an early halt.
It's been the formation of choice this season too but the champions just aren't clicking in the same away.
As against Sarajevo, Riga and Kilmarnock they came up against a well-organised defence and for long spells never looked like breaking it down.
Where last season Edouard and Leigh Griffiths struck up a formidable partnership, Celtic have struggled to recreate that chemistry in the Scotland man's absence.
Both natural strikers who like to drop deep or wide, the pair asked questions of defences as one generally provided a threat through the middle as the other dropped into space.
Partnered with Elyounoussi or Christie though Edouard's forays can often leave the centre-backs with very little to worry about, with neither man replicating the natural moves of a striker.
Couple that with Shane Duffy carrying out from the back in a style reminiscent of an Ent marching on Isengard and the Hoops are far too predictable in possession.
They're getting results, but Celtic have been turgid for much of the season so far and Lennon will hope the timely return of Griffiths will get his side back to the form they showed last term.
Good signs for Saints
With just two wins from their opening 10 games it's been a difficult start for St Johnstone and their new manager Callum Davidson.
Against Celtic though he got his tactics spot on, setting up his side to sit deep and congest the central areas while looking to break when they could.
Had Conway been more precise with his finishing St Johnstone could have taken the lead, and for all Celtic's domination of the ball they rarely troubled Zander Clark until those agonising final minutes.
A very different task awaits Davidson's side after the break but the manager saw his game plan work to perfection.
Tougher tests ahead
With all credit to St Johnstone, who were brilliantly organised, Celtic will have to step things up against better opposition.
They've got a real tough run of fixtures after the international break: Rangers, Milan, Aberdeen and Lille in the space of 12 days.
The last six derby meetings have seen three wins apiece, and Steven Gerrard's side will be champing at the bit to prove they're serious title contenders.
Milan come calling after that, and it's fair to assume Zlatan Ibrahimovic will be less forgiving than Conway if presented the chance the St Johnstone man spurned.
Aberdeen is the archetypal tough place to go, and Lille are unbeaten in Ligue 1 this season.
The season won't be made or broken in October but Celtic could give themselves a mountain to climb both at home and in Europe if they're similarly insipid in the upcoming games.

Whether or not you live in Massachusetts, you should be paying attention to a very important vote coming up in November's election. Not for president, or senator, or even city council-no, Question 1 is a proposition that could dramatically strengthen or weaken the state's landmark right-to-repair law that previously forced automakers to make it easier for you to get your car fixed.
Essentially, Massachusetts voters are deciding on whether or not to add "mechanical" vehicle telematics data-realtime updates from a car's sundry sensors transmitted to an automaker's private servers-to the list of things OEMs have to share with independent mechanics. Telematics data was purposefully excluded from the original 2013 law, but as cars have gotten more computerized over the last decade, that gap in coverage has grown more pronounced.
The full information about what is appearing on the ballot can be found here. Voting "Yes" to Question 1 would expand access to wirelessly transmitted mechanical data regarding vehicle maintenance and repair. But what makes this a big deal for those outside Massachusetts is that the amendment will require automakers who want to do business in the state to make that data accessible through a smartphone app for owners starting in 2022.
Remember, it was the 2013 law's passage that forced automakers to adopt a nationwide right-to-repair standard. Could the same happen with open-access telematics data, You may also like: Diagnostic Tool. which will only grow in importance as more cars add on driver-assist features? Pro-Question 1 organization Massachusetts Right to Repair argues the amendment would futureproof the law for consumers and independent repair shops beyond the state's borders.
Voting "No" would make no change to governing access over wirelessly transmitted vehicle data, meaning automakers would be under no obligation to provide a standard that consumers could use to analyze diagnostic information other than what is currently provided through the vehicle's OBDII port. Anti-Question 1 organization Coalition for Safe and Secure Data claims the proposition is nothing more than a data grab for third parties who want to access vehicle information remotely and in real-time. The group further argues that forcing automakers to open up their lines could potentially expose call data, GPS coordinates and other personal information to hackers.
Because everything in politics has to be awful, the Coalition for Safe and Secure Data even funded a commercial to push the extremely wrong and off-putting idea that Question 1 would allow ual predators to track or remotely control the vehicles of their intended victims.
And there are some weighty forces at war here. According to Ballotpedia, more than $47 million has been spent by supporters and opponents to sway public opinion so far. The Right to Repair Coalition contributed $21.4 million, reportedly receiving large seven-figure donations from organizations like the Coalition of Automotive Repair Equality, Auto Care Association, Auto Zone, O'Reilly Auto Parts and Advance Auto Parts.
Meanwhile, the Coalition for Safe and Secure Data has shelled out at least $25.8 million to oppose Question 1, reportedly receiving large seven-figure donations from General Motors, Toyota, Ford, Honda and Nissan. Go figure.
Lobbying aside, the fact that groups are spending millions of dollars to oppose one another on a pro-consumer change boils down to two very important questions. First, should a consumer have a legal right to self-diagnose and self-repair a product that they purchased or otherwise own? We can all generally agree that yes, they should. We've highlighted what's on the other side of that before: the modern tractor industry, which lacks such a standard, is a maze of data gatekeepers and propriety repairs that actually drives farmers to seek out old, computer-free models instead.
But second, it's fair to ask why Massachusetts-a state which houses two percent of the U.S. population and where no major automaker has built vehicles since GM shut down its Framingham Assembly Plant in 1989-should dictate legislation with potentially far-reaching ramifications. Beyond th.